Show Less
Restricted access

Intersubjectivity, Humanity, Being

Edith Stein’s Phenomenology and Christian Philosophy

Edited By Mette Lebech and John Haydn Gurmin

This volume brings together revised versions of papers presented at the inaugural conference of the International Association for the Study of the Philosophy of Edith Stein (IASPES). The conference papers are supplemented by a number of specially commissioned essays in order to provide a representative sample of the best research currently being carried out on Stein’s philosophy in the English speaking world. The first part of the volume centres on Stein’s phenomenology; the second part looks at her Christian philosophy; and the third part explores the contexts of her philosophical work.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

A Possible Opening Up of Phenomenology Towards the Metaphysical Question of Materia Prima: Edith Stein’s Thought in Relation to the Work of Vitalis de Furno, Edmund Husserl and Hedwig Conrad-Martius

Extract

← 524 | 525 →FRANCESCO ALFIERI OFM1

ABSTRACT: This paper seeks to analyze the approach to matter as set out by Edith Stein in Potency and Act and in Finite and Eternal Being. The results help to clarify Stein’s position regarding the principium individuationis. After a brief description of the typically medieval ideas and themes analysed by Stein, the discussion will show how her reasoning starts from the ontological-formal and gnoseological corpus of Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology. This analysis also tries to show how the specificity of Stein’s writings is due to the fact that her work has always been communitarian: every paragraph of her texts is full of comparisons, quotations, references to other authors that are fundamental to Stein’s research and journey towards the ‘truth’. Of key importance here is the work of Hedwig Conrad-Martius, whose influence on Stein is assessed in detail.

On the complex question of formal and material ontology systematically developed by Edith Stein in her writings, especially in Potency and Act and in Finite and Eternal Being, we shall start by isolating the question ← 525 | 526 →of material ontology in order to compare it with Husserl’s research on material a priori and to delineate Stein’s specific position on the ‘doctrine of matter’. The close comparison with the work of Husserl in this paper seeks to show how distant Stein’s position is from Husserl’s due to her introduction of ‘unformed prime matter’, a concept that is not compatible with the doctrine of material a priori...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.