Methodological Principles and Practice
Edited By Michael Grenfell and Frédéric Lebaron
Conclusion to Part III
Part III shows the fertility of the combination of a sociological theoretical programme inspired by Bourdieu, as presented in Part I, and the appropriate use of Geometric Data Analysis techniques.
GDA techniques allow us to operationalize empirically the concepts of social space and field and to substantiate statistically the relations between dispositions and practices, positions and position-takings, trajectories and lifestyles, actors and discourses.
Since the 1970s, Bourdieu and his colleagues have made a systematic and important use of these techniques, especially Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA): his first article referring to GDA was ‘L’anatomie du gout’ (1976c) with Monique de Saint-Martin, republished in La distinction (1979). Then came the article ‘Le patronat’, with Monique de Saint-Martin, in 1978. After these two major publications of empirical results which are clearly strongly based on GDA methods, Bourdieu published the results of two MCAs in Homo academicus (1984) in order to study the universe of academics; he completed his analysis of ‘Le patronat’ in La noblesse d’Etat (1989) with a series of CAs and MCAs. He also published the results of GDA methods in a large collective study about the field of real estate companies and public policies in France (Bourdieu et al. 1990; Bourdieu 2000). It is no surprise that Bourdieu used these techniques in: 1) an investigation about cultural practices and lifestyles; 2) a study of dominant groups (economic and intellectual elites); and 3) the (economic) sociology of a ‘market’ and a public policy sector.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.