Essays on Utopian Thought and Practice
Edited By Michael J. Griffin and Tom Moylan
The Party of Utopia: Utopian Fiction and the Politics of Readership 1880–1900
← 144 | 145 → MATTHEW BEAUMONT
In the concluding paragraph of “Utopianism after the End of Utopia” in Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, an account of an exhibition of contemporary conceptual art, Fredric Jameson makes a tantalizing reference to what he calls the “Party of Utopia”:
Yet in our time, where the claims of the officially political seem extraordinarily enfeebled and where the taking of older kinds of political positions seems to inspire widespread embarrassment, it should also be noted that one finds everywhere today – not least among artists and writers – something like an unacknowledged “party of Utopia”: an underground party whose numbers are difficult to determine, whose program remains unannounced and perhaps even unformulated, whose existence is unknown to the citizenry at large and to the authorities, but whose numbers seem to recognize one another by means of secret Masonic signals (180).
“One even has the feeling,” he concludes with a mischievous wink, “that some of the present exhibitors may be among its adherents” (180).
I have the feeling that a substantial number of academics associated with the constantly expanding field of utopian studies are not merely adherents to, or fellow travelers of, the Party of Utopia, so much as paid-up members, if not committed full-timers. Jameson himself explicitly dedicates Archaeologies of the Future to a handful of comrades in the Party – scholars and writers Peter Fitting, Darko Suvin, Susan Willis, and Kim Stanley Robinson – who collectively constitute what might...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.