Towards a Cognitive Theory of the Linguistic Sign
The book outlines a new approach to the study of motivation in language, which is firmly rooted in the paradigm of cognitive linguistics, but it is developed in critical (and constructive) dialogue with classical theories in semiotics: Ferdinand de Saussure’s structural linguistics and Charles S. Peirce’s model of the sign. The author’s proposal hinges upon the Peircean distinction between iconic, indexical, and symbolic signs, but the classical typology is reinterpreted within the framework of cognitive linguistics. The approach does not seek to "categorize" different linguistic expressions into one of the three Peircean types, but attempts to capture the dynamicity of meanings in terms of iconicity, indexicality, and conventionality. The book presents an analysis of selected vocabulary and morphosyntactic structures of English.
Aristotle (2014) Metaphysics. Translated by W. D. Ross. The Internet Classics Archive. Accessed November 14, 2014. Available at
Bailey, C.-J. N. and Roger W. Shuy (eds.) (1973) New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Barcelona, A. (ed.) (2003) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. New York: Mounton de Gruyter.
Berlin, B. and Kay, P. (1969) Basic Colors. Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. and Raven, P. (1974) Principles of Tzeltal Plant Classification. New York: Academic Press.
Bethke, B. (2000) “Etymology of Cyberpunk.” [Internet]. Available from:
Black, M. (1949) Language and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Black, M. (1962) Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.