Discourses on Values and Norms in the Marprelate Controversy (1588/89)
Elizabethans saw eloquent language as the mark of the civilized gentleman. At the same time, they believed language to be able to harm, analogous to physical violence. Such concepts of language have important implications for the study of religious controversies of the time, in which the authors often attacked each other harshly via printed language. Employing historical discourse analysis, this study analyses Elizabethan concepts of violent language and shows under which circumstances Elizabethans understood language use as violence. In a second step, the main contributions in one of the most notorious theological controversies of the time, the Marprelate controversy, are analysed in terms of how these concepts of violent language were used as strategies of legitimation and de-legitimation.
1 The Religious Field and the Violence of Printed Theological Controversies in Elizabethan England
1.1 The English Reformation
1.2 Elizabethan Inner-Protestant Controversies
1.2.1 Elizabethan Press Censorship
1.2.2 The Vestments Controversy
1.2.3 The Admonition Controversy
1.2.4 The Marprelate Controversy
2 Violent Language in Elizabethan Speech Ethics
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.