Show Less
Restricted access

The Perception of Employer Branding in relation with Organizational Commitment, Organizational Identification and Communication Climate in Higher Education Institutions

İsmet Burçak Vatansever Durmaz

Employer branding is a concept which was introduced in 1996 and is defined as «the package of functional, economic and psychological benefits provided by employment, and identified with the employing company» (Amber & Barrow, 1996).

Even though the concept was originally introduced as a marketing term, latterly the employer branding terminology has entered the human resource management world. Organizations have to work on the desired level of employer branding internally and also externally to achieve efficiency and effectiveness. Organizations focused mostly on attracting and recruiting talents in a wide range of competitive environment which is influenced by a «war for talents». Employer branding is also known as an effective mechanism which is related to the internal value perceptions on the organizations.

The Higher Education industry, which is one of the biggest service industries in the world, has to give importance to the term «employer branding» for external and also internal stakeholders. Since the idea of the universities has changed, it forces universities to be one of the growth industries. This growth generates some important and critical challenges on working conditions of academics and also administrative personnel in higher education institutions (HEIs).

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

List of Tables

Extract



Tab. 1: Environment Processing Metatheories. Source: Ehrhart and Ziegert (2005)

Tab. 2: Interactionist Process Metatheory. Source: Ehrhart and Ziegert (2005)

Tab. 3: Self-Processing Metatheories. Source: Ehrhart and Ziegert (2005)

Tab. 4: Comparison of Defensive and Supportive Communication Climate. Source: Costigan and Schmeidler (2001)Tab. 5: 000 Reliability Results in Preliminary Study

Tab. 5: Reliability results in preliminary study

Tab. 6: The Criteria of URAP. Source: http://tr.urapcenter.org/2010/2010_10.php, 01.09.2017

Tab. 7: URAP 2016–2017 Ranking of Fountation Universities. Source: http://tr.urapcenter.org/2016/2016_t6.php, 01.09.2017

Tab. 8: Correlation analysis

Tab. 9: Rability Analyses for All Scales

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.