Applying Philosophy of Art in a Global World
Edited By Zoltan Somhegyi and Max Ryynänen
9 Questions not Answers: The Usefulness of the Philosophy of Art to Artistic Practice & Education (Matthew Rowe)
AbstractThis chapter builds upon a 2012 article of mine (“View From a Bridge: Aesthetics as a Guide to Practice”), which outlined an approach of using the philosophy of art in art school settings through “translating” abstract philosophical problems into concrete situations that bear on an artist’s practice. This text thus attempts a (tentative and speculative) theoretical exploration of why this approach might be fruitful.
This exploration is underpinned by a discussion of an asymmetric relationship between the philosophy of art and art, in which it is argued that (a) the philosophy of art cannot have a regulatory role for artistic practice and consequently (b) the idea of philosophical progress can apply to the philosophy of art but not to artistic practice.
The paper proposes another “translation” – of the purposes of philosophical aesthetics – to reflect its situatedness within artistic rather than philosophical practice. When so situated the kind of critical analysis on which philosophical progress relies are discarded as philosophy’s own concern, leaving only those philosophical techniques which open discussion and invite dialogue. As such, this suggests an attitude in which positions and theories within philosophy are treated by artists as useful rather than true. It’s proposed therefore that the purpose of the philosophy of art, when situated within artistic practice is to instigate a certain kind of philosophical questioning that opens up the possibilities of a practice, artwork, art form, material or medium, for an artist.
In conclusion, it’s argued...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.