Show Less
Restricted access

Reframing Reformulation: A Theoretical-Experimental Approach

Evidence from the Spanish Discourse Marker "o sea"

Series:

Shima Salameh Jiménez

Reformulation studies offer a recent debate on reformulation and its semasiological-onomasiological treatment. Some researchers argue for a clear distinction between reformulation and other functions such as conclusion or correction; others defend the existence of different subtypes of reformulation based on such other functions, which are expressed by the same group of discourse markers in different languages. Both approaches are valid although their arguments and theoretical basis are opposed. The book presents an Eye-Tracking proposal to complement this debate experimentally. Results support an onomasiological approach to reformulation since experimental boundaries for each function (paraphrase, reformulation, conclusion and correction) have been detected.

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

References

Extract



Antos, G. (1982). Grundlagen Einer Theorie des Formulierens: Textherstellung in Geschriebener Und Gesprocher Sprache. Reihe Germanistische Linguistik. De Gruyter.

Adam, J. M., & Revaz, F. (1989). Aspects de la structuration du texte descrip-tif: les marqueurs d’énumération et de reformulation, LaF, 81, 59–98: https://www.persee.fr/doc/lfr_0023-8368_1989_num_81_1_4769 (25-04-2019). doi: 10.3406/lfr.1989.4769.

Addo, R. T. (Ed.). (2016). Ocular drug delivery: Advances, challenges and applications. Springer.

Aijmer, K. (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. John Benjamins.

Aijmer, K., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (2003). The discourse particle well and its equivalents in Swedish and Dutch. Linguistics, 41(6). doi:10.1515/ling.2003.036.

Altmann, G., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(5), 685–712.

Alvarado, H. A. (2007). Significados institucionales y personales del teorema del límite central en la enseñanza de estadística en ingeniería [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidad de Zaragoza.

Anderson, R., Bothell, D., & Douglass, S. (2004). Eye movements do not reflect retrieval processes: Limits of the eye-mind hypothesis. Psychological Science, 15(4), 225–231. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00656.x.

Anderson, R., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2010). Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: How speed affects durations, latencies, and more. Journal of Eye-Movement Research, 3(3, 6), 1–12.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.