Show Less

Proceedings of Methods XIII

Papers from the Thirteenth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, 2008


Edited By Barry Heselwood and Clive Upton

This volume of papers from the 13th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, held at the University of Leeds in 2008, collects together current research and recent methodological developments in the study of dialects by new and established scholars. It is organised into themed sections reporting on historical dialectology, dialect literature, the production of dialect maps and atlases, and the collection and organisation of material for dialect dictionaries and corpora. Perceptual dialectology and dialect intelligibility are also featured, and there are linguistic analyses of dialectal data from many language varieties.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

PART I. Historical Dialectology And Dialect Literature


Part I Historical Dialectology And Dialect Literature 1. Reallocation and codification in seventeenth- and eighteenth- century Paris R. Anthony Lodge University of Saint Andrews, UK 1. Introduction Histories of French usually structure their narrative around the development of the standard language, following the processes identified by E. Haugen in his classic 1968 study of standardisation: selection of the speech of Paris as the basis for the future standard in the thirteenth century, elaboration of the functional capacity of French in the later Middle Ages, codification of the norms of the standard language during the early-modern period, and acceptance of standard French by the relevant population during the nineteenth-twentieth centuries (see for example Lodge 1993). This top-down approach works well in France, thanks to the dominant position occupied since the thirteenth century by the country's capital city. However, a model which locates the engine of language change primarily in the standard language is hard to reconcile with the idea that linguistic change develops essentially in the everyday interactions of ordinary speakers, and involves the speech community as a whole, not merely as passive recipients of the standard, but as active participants in the development and diffusion of new linguistic norms. Pressure for linguistic uniformity undoubtedly comes from top-down standardisation, but it also comes from bottom-up levelling and koineization (Hornsby 2006). In this paper, I will argue that the codification movement in seventeenth-eighteenth-century Paris, while obviously forming part of the standardisation process, had its roots in an ongoing (and more basic) process...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.