The Change toward Cooperation in the George W. Bush Administration’s Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy toward North Korea
Foreword The case of North Korea constitutes probably the most spectacular failure of the international efforts toward nonproliferation of nuclear weapons, culminating in the NPT Treaty. The isolated regime in Pyongyang represents a peculiar mixture of Stalinism and Fascism, with a „beloved leader“—as the regime’s propaganda calls the dictator. During the 1980’s and the following decade the regime has managed to produce fissionable nuclear material, and it exploded a plutonium device in October 2006. Today experts suspect that North Korea, which has de- clared it has accumulated 37 kilograms of plutonium, has some five or six nu- clear warheads at its disposal. At the same time the regime is developing long- range missiles, highlighting the threat not only to its neighbours South Korea and Japan, but also to the Pacific area as a whole. As Jonas Schneider rightly states in the introduction of his study, the United States of America feels particu- larly affected by this challenge. North Korea’s nuclear weapons program not only threatens the United States’ Northeast Asian allies, but also undermines the global NPT regime. This concerns the proliferation of nuclear material and know-how to third parties as well as the potential destabilization of other world regions, e.g. the Middle East. Schneider does not deal with U.S. policy toward North Korea in general, but he is asking a specific research question: Why has the administration of Presi- dent George W. Bush changed its policy after North Korea’s first nuclear test from the previous „tough“ approach toward...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.