Show Less

Making Software Teams Effective

How Agile Practices Lead to Project Success Through Teamwork Mechanisms

Chaehan So

How does good teamwork emerge?
Can we control mechanisms of teamwork?
The author has analyzed these questions in a study involving 227 participants of 55 software development teams. First, he empirically confirmed his teamwork model based on innovation research, goal setting and control theory. Second, he measured the impact of a wide selection of agile practices on these teamwork mechanisms. Third, he explained these impacts based on a thorough review of current psychological research.
This book is intended for people working in agile contexts as they will gain insight into the complexity of how «good teamwork» emerges. This insight on team dynamics may also prove valuable for upper management for calibrating agile practices and «soft factors», thus increasing the effectiveness of software teams.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Bibliography 175

Extract

Bibliography Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2002). Agile software development methods: Review and analysis (Tech. Rep.). Oulu, Finland: VTT Publications 478. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(103), 411–423. Argyris, C. (1966). Interpersonal barriers to decision making. Harvard Business Review, 44(2), 84–97. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational learning ii: Theory, method and practice. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley. Arrow, H., McGrath, J., & Berdahl, J. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struc- tural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 397-438. Aubé, C., & Rousseau, V. (2005, September). Team goal commitment and team ef- fectiveness - the role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice., 9(3), 189–204. Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 45–87. Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multi- faceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equa- tion Modeling, 1, 35–67. Bales, R. F. (1958). Task roles and social roles in problem-solving groups. In E. E. Mac- coby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 437– 447). New York: Holt and Rinehart and Winston. 175 Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.