Afterword – The nature of linguistic norms and their relevance to multilingual development (Li Wei) 397
397 Afterword The nature of linguistic norms and their relevance to multilingual development Li Wei 1. Introduction The notion of “linguistic norms” has existed as long as linguistics itself as a dis- cipline. In fact, some might say that the whole point of linguistics is to specify either the norms of individual languages or the universal norms governing lan- guages generally. Prescriptivism has a strong tradition in linguistics. The amount of publications on pronunciation, spelling and grammar is overwhelm- ing. These publications clearly have their readership and user groups. Teachers, speech and language therapists, second language learners, among others, often refer to them, and academic linguists are only too happy for their work to be used. Rarely does the question of the nature of linguistic norms arise. But why do we need to bother with the question of the nature of linguistic norms? And what relevance does the question have to our interest in the language develop- ment of multilingual speakers, the focus of the present volume? The answers to the two questions are linked: the question of the nature of linguistic norms has huge implications for the study of language development of multilingual speak- ers, and that is why we need to address it. 2. Linguistic norms are social in nature It may sound surprising, but a moment’s thought makes it clear that languages do not have norms themselves; it is people who impose norms on them! The so- called linguistic norms are norms of usage, not standards of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.