Show Less

Owning the Mind

Beiträge zur Frage geistigen Eigentums


Edited By Paul Ferstl and Stefan Wedrac

Die Beiträge dieses Bandes, verfasst in deutscher und englischer Sprache aus den Bereichen der Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften, der vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft, der Musikwissenschaft, der Philosophie sowie der Kulturwissenschaften, widmen sich Fragen der Zensur, des Urheber- und Interpretenrechts sowie hochaktuellen Diskussionen um den Zusammenhang zwischen Intertextualitätstheorien und Plagiatsvorwürfen. Ferner behandelt werden (sub)kulturelle Gegenentwürfe zu gängigen Modellen der Informationsweitergabe, ökonomische Grundlagen des Schutzes kulturellen Eigentums sowie aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Internetkultur, die für Fragen des geistigen Eigentums von weitreichender Bedeutung sind.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

DANIEL SYROVY Copyright infringement or creative impulse? Avellaneda’s continuation of Don Quijote 209


DANIEL SYROVY COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OR CREATIVE IMPULSE? AVELLANEDA’S CONTINUA­ TION OF DON QUIJOTE I Talking about copyright infringement in 17th century Spain is of course an anachronism . The privilegio, a decree of the king that prohibited pirated editions for a certain timespan (10 or 20 years, for instance) was indeed a means of protecting a literary text . But even then, with today’s Spain being split into several kingdoms (of which one would have needed separate privilegios, a long and difficult procedure in itself, to get full protection), and the widely used possibility of print- ing pirated editions abroad, there was little in the way of a guarantee for either author or printer .22 That, in any case, concerned complete texts only, and the idea that a plot or even a character would be somehow the legal property of an author, was altogether unheard of . Of course, this does not mean that all is fair game . Yet, when we try to (re-)assess the relationship between Miguel de Cervan- tes’ Don Quijote and its spurious continuation, the Quijote by Alonso Fernández de Avellaneda (1614), we should first of all strip away all our preconceptions of, and prejudice against the phenomenon . And 22 Cf . Jaime Moll, Problemas bibliográficos del libro del Siglo de Oro, http://www .cervantesvirtual .com/servlet/ SirveObras/80237397808796384100080/p0000001 .htm (‚El privilegio‘) . 210 Daniel Syrovy prejudice there is, not too little of it: the attitude of most cervantistas towards Avellaneda is one of a certain moral outrage, denouncing as a...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.