Show Less

Venture Capital

Fund Certification, Performance Prediction and Learnings from the Past

Series:

Armin Höll-Steiner

This book contains three studies. The first study investigates the relationship between private equity investors and fund managers and how intermediaries can mitigate their agency problems. The incentive structure of three intermediary types and their behavior in signaling fund qualities to investors are studied theoretically. A recommendation which intermediary to consult is given. The second study presents a new statistical method to predict the performance distribution of venture capital direct investments. The accuracy of this method is investigated and compared to existing approaches. The third study is about the European venture capital market’s historic development before and after the internet bubble and reasons for the bad development especially after the bubble.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Appendices

Extract

for Chapter 2 1 Proof of Lemma 1 Proof. The average reputation after certifying a PEF has to be positive for the certifier to remain in business, i. e. the reputation change from investors x ·RI,g − y ·RI,b has to be geater or equal to 0. In the long run, the certifier wants to keep his reputation for any x and y. In consequence x ·RI,g − y ·RI,b ≥ 0 x ·RI,g ≥ y ·RI,b With RI,b ≥ RI,g and x > 0 the inequality returns 1 ≥ RI,g RI,b ≥ y x x ≥ y . For x = 0 we get −y · RI,b ≥ 0, so y would have to be 0. In this case the certifier would not issue any certificates. 2 Proof of Lemma 2 Proof. If a certifier blindly certifies with z > 0 funds his reputation gain will be z · γ · RI,g − z · (1 − γ) · RI,b which has to be at least 0 to keep his reputation level. Rewritten it follows RI,g RI,b ≥ 1− γ γ . 238 Appendices for Chapter 2 Due to Equation (2.2) the reputation ratio is less than 1. This is only true for γ ≥ 0.5 which is excluded by assumption (2.1). 3 Proof of Theorem 3 Proof. To proof the condition p ≥ 1 − γ, I consider the contrary case p 0 p ≥ (1− p) · 1− γ γ RI,b RI,g p · (1 + 1− γ γ RI,b RI,g ) ≥ 1− γ γ RI,b RI,g p ≥ 1−γ γ RI,b...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.