A Study of CRM in Government
3 Methodology and Data Analysis 67
67 3 Methodology and Data Analysis This research used the case study method (Yin 2003). Social scientists have long used case study analysis as a method of examining public administration. The study aimed to gain deeper insights into the perception of CiRM and its implementation and im- pact. This chapter provides an overview of the research methodology (Section 3.1), including the three main steps taken in the study. The empirical procedure and data sources used for this study are reported in Section 3.2. Data analysis (Section 3.3) was primarily inductive, following a modified grounded theory approach (Strauss/Corbin 1998). Possible propositions from each case study were discerned, and a cross-case comparison was conducted. Special attention is given to the limitations of this research in Section 3.4. Figure 3-1 presents an overview of the research design. Further details are discussed in Chapter 0, which presents the qualitative results of the study. 3.1 Research method Simon (1947) once said that “there can never be a science of public administration from the viewpoint of practice; it can only be studied scientifically through rigorous methods of social science” (Riccucci 2001). Studies of public administration as well as Figure 3-1: Research Design Case III City of Baltimore Case II City of New York Case IV City of Chicago Case I Miami-Dade County CiRM perception, implementation / experience; impact Methodology Level of experience with and stage of CiRM implementation - + Exploratory case study based on semi-structured interviews/documents Method Theoretical Perspective Grounded theory process (coding) Single-case analysis...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.