Jews, Christians and Pagans in Antiquity
Edited By Jörg Ulrich, David Brakke and Anders-Christian Jacobsen
Josephus' Contra Apionem as Jewish Apologetics 265
Josephus' Contra Apionem as Jewish Apologetics John M.G. Barclay Josephus' treatise Contra Apionem is the only full extant treatise from ancient Judaism in the apologetic genre (which I will define below), and is one of the most interesting examples of apologetic seif-representation from antiquity.1 None of our Jewish evidence of- fers more than partial and fragmentary parallels to this treatise, so it is largely impossible to trace antecedents and developments in Jewish apologetics before this point (90s of the first century CE). But Contra Apionem more than makes up for this lack: here we have a rieh source, entertaining, multi-faceted, intelligent, rhetorically skilful, and almost paradigmatic of the apologetic phenomenon, with all its complexities and ideological possibilities. In this essay I will attempt to accomplish three tasks. First, I will discuss how and, by what definition, the text can be considered an 'apology' in its rhetorical or literary genre. Secondly, I will make brief remarks an parallels in Greek and Roman antiquity, before, thirdly, explor- ing Josephus' apologetic strategies, which are fine exemplars of the intellectual work required by effective apologetics in any age. 1. Contra Apionem as Apology A brief survey of the text indicates that Josephus has packaged his diverse material in a form dominated by the mode of 'response' to criticisms, accusations and slanders.2 In the introduction (1.1-5), par- ' For full discussion see my commentary, J.M.G. Barclay, Flavius Josephus. Transla- tion and Commentary. Vol. 10. Against Apion, Leiden 2006. 2 I designate the structure of the...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.