1. LITERATURE AND SCIENCE: THE "TWO CULTURES"?
1.1The "two cultures" debate Second Law and all that, I do remember the litcrits grabbing at that because of something someone had said half a century before about their ignorance. That and the Principle of Uncertainty, hardly a writer who didn't have to show he'd heard of them and drag them in at the drop of a thinking cap. The debate between the `two cultures' was sparked off and named alter C.P.Snow's Rede Lecture "The Two Cultures" (1959) and F.R.Leavis' fierce reply "Two Cultures? The Significance of C.P. Snow" (1962), which itself constitutes an updating of the older debate between T.H. Huxley and Matthew Arnold about the roles of literature and science in education. As a matter of fact, no culture has been without its version of the debate — but the conflicts have been most intense whenever one side or other laid exclusive claim to the provision of foundational planks for the good of an entire culture2 In 1880, T.H. Huxley delivered a lecture on the occasion of the opening of Mason College in Birmingham, whose educational program, in the context of the industrial revolution, rested exclusively on scientific training, deliberately banishing theology and literary instruction from the college. Huxley refers to the ancient querelle des anciens et des modernes for the pre-eminence of classical or modern literature in education and brings it up to date in a new querelle which sets humanists against scientists? He makes a plead for the importance of 1 C. Brooke-Rose, Verbivore, Manchester, Carcanet, 1990,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.