Show Less

Market Constellation Research

A Modern Governance Approach to Macroeconomic Policy


Edited By Arne Heise

The objective of this reader is manifold: On the one hand, it intends to establish a new perspective at the policy level named ‘market constellations’: institutionally embedded systems of macroeconomic governance which are able to explain differences in growth and employment developments. At the polity level, the question raised is whether or not market constellations can be governed and, thus, whether institutions can be created which will provide the incentives necessary for favourable market constellations. Finally, at the politics level, the immediate question is whether (distributional) vested interests can be bared in order to explain the motivations to create certain market constellations. A promising approach to tackle this task needs to take into account different cultural backgrounds and must provide political transmission mechanisms for turning vested interests into policy.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Introduction 11


11 Introduction Comparing economic models – i.e. different sets of institutions embedding economic behaviour of individual or collective agents – appears to be a rather modern activity of economists. Whereas comparing political institutions and electoral systems has been a prominent task of political scientists right from the beginning of scientific inquiry into political issues, economists were preoccupied with searching for ‘economic laws’ and started to systematically compare national economies only after reality had produced an alternative to market-based capitalism: centrally-planned socialism. For a long time, the distinction between private property and market coordination on the one hand and collective property and bureaucratic command on the other was at the centre of the investigation of ‘economic models’ and their systematic impact on income and productivity growth, employment and income equality. Only after the collapse of the socialist system in the late 1980s did economists begin to realise what the political scientist Andrew Shonfield had pointed out decades before: market-based capitalism shows marked internal differentiations with respect to its formal and informal institutional set-up which is capable of explaining different economic performances. Since then, the literature on ‘varieties of capitalism’ has boomed with a two-fold objective: to distinguish between different models (country clusters of similar institutional set-ups) and their relative economic performance and to explore different paths and potentials for adaptation to similar challenges (‘globalisation’) – does the ‘war of the models’ require a convergence of institutional set-ups towards a blue-print of best practice or is a divergence still possible or even necessary? 1. Key...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.