30. Is Christianity the true Israel?
In Christian doctrine, statements from the Hebrew Bible were interpreted in re- lation to the New Testament. As such, Christians believed that Judaism had lost its the theological foundation since the Hebrew Bible no longer possessed any value of its own. It was seen only as a "promise" that found its "fulfillment" in the New Testament. The interpretation of the statements in the Hebrew Bible relative to the New Testament was known as "typology", and church scholars outdid each other in finding such typologies. Typology formed a link between the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament and was seen as proof that Christianity embodied "true Ju- daism". This was also highlighted by the term "Late Judaism" used for Judaism, for whose existence there was no theological justification since the Hebrew Bible is only comprehensible and valid from the perspective of the New Testament. The Hebrew Bible was seen to only bear witness to the rightness of the Christian teachings. The Christians placed all the more value on this witness because it came from their adversaries, the Jews. Paul already makes use of such typologies, for example in Gal 4:22-25: "For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave woman and the other by a free woman. One, the child of the slave, was born according to the flesh; the other, the child of the free woman, was born through the promise. Now this is an allegory: these women are two covenants. One woman, in fact,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.