In Memory of Michael Clyne- In Collaboration with Catrin Norrby, Leo Kretzenbacher, Carla Amorós
Edited By Rudolf Muhr
Munirah ALAJLAN: Dominant and Non-Dominant Varieties in the Gulf: Social Class or Region?
In: Rudolf Muhr (ed.) (2012): Non-dominant Varieties of pluricentric Languages. Getting the Pic- ture. In memory of Michael Clyne. Wien et. al., Peter Lang Verlag. p. 387-400. Munirah ALAJLAN Kuwait University, Kuwait (firstname.lastname@example.org) Dominant and Non-Dominant Varieties in the Gulf: Social Class or Region? Abstract This paper will give an overview of the Arabic language, specifically the variety used in the Gulf region and the different varieties within each dialect, in terms of social class and other variables, such as gender, edu- cational background and ethnic origin which can have an impact on the use of language. Within the Gulf region, the dialects of Arabic spoken are called Gulf Arabic and each country has its own variety. Which variety dominates the Gulf? And which one is the high variety? Is Arabic consid- ered to be a pluricentric language? There is no one variety that is ac- cepted by all Gulf speakers as a prestigious standard. 1. Introduction Sociolinguistics is the study of the relationship between society and the way language is used. Many speech communities have two (or more) varieties of language. One is referred to as the High variety (H), and the other as the Low va- riety (L). This situation is commonly known as diglossia. Ferguson (1959) illus- trated the criteria of diglossia by demonstrating four contexts which he regarded as most significant examples of diglossia: Swiss German, Modern Greek, Arabic and Haitian Creole. In these contexts, both the high variety and the low variety co-occur. He...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.