Show Less

150 Jahre «Max Havelaar»- 150 Years «Max Havelaar»

Multatulis Roman in neuer Perspektive - Multatuli’s Novel from New Perspectives

Edited By Jaap Grave, Olf Praamstra and Hans Vandevoorde

Im Jahre 1860 erschien Multatulis Max Havelaar. Der Roman, der in Amsterdam und der ehemaligen ostindischen Kolonie der Niederlande des 19. Jahrhunderts spielt, sorgte für viel Aufsehen. Die Qualität des Romans rechtfertigt eine vielfältige und fruchtbare Forschung jedoch nicht nur im sprachübergreifenden, sondern auch im interdisziplinären Sinne. Auf dem Prüfstand stehen narratologische, poetologische und intertextuelle Lesarten, zudem wird der Max Havelaar wissenschaftshistorischen, postkolonialen und ideologiekritischen Analysen unterzogen. Die Autoren dieses Bandes, internationale Literaturwissenschaftler, die sich im Dezember 2010 anlässlich einer Fachkonferenz an der Freien Universität Berlin versammelt haben, erweitern und aktualisieren mit ihren Beiträgen die nationale und internationale Multatuli-Forschung und betrachten den Roman in einer vollkommen neuen Perspektive.
One hundred and fifty years ago, in 1860, Multatuli's Max Havelaar was published. Set in 19th century Amsterdam and in the then Dutch colony of the East Indies the novel caused a considerable stir among contemporary readers. The quality of the novel justifies multiple and fruitful research not only outside the language borders but also in an interdisciplinary way. That is the goal of this book: to do research on narratological, poetical and intertextual aspects of Max Havelaar, and moreover to make it the subject of postcolonial, ideological and historical analyses. In this way, during a conference at the Free University Berlin in December 2010 literary scholars not only widened and brought the Mul­tatuli research up to date, but also examined the novel from new perspectives.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

The Man from Natal. Multatuli as a Eurasian Writer; Olf Praamstra


The Man from Natal. Multatuli as a Eurasian Writer Olf Praamstra Introduction A notorious name in Multatuli studies is Theodoor Swart Abrahamsz, a nephew of the famous writer, who tried in 1888 to demonstrate that his uncle was men- tally ill – a neurotic and sexually degenerate “monstrum” who suffered from megalomania, paranoia and a compulsion to gamble. This analysis, called “A history of a disease”, was first published in De Gids and published separately later on. Swart Abrahamsz wrote as an authority on the matter because he had taken his doctoral degree in medicine in 1873, be it on a neurological subject. Later he became a health officer with the navy in the Dutch East Indies, where he also worked as a garrison doctor. In terms of his knowledge of psychiatry – a discipline that hardly existed at the time – he was a layman and his analysis was therefore vigorously disputed by other laymen. He caused quite a stir, but hardly anyone took him seriously.1 On the other hand, another article about his uncle, no less provocative, seems to have escaped anybody’s notice. This piece was called “Multatuli as a Eurasian”, and here Swart Abrahamsz tries to prove that Multatuli was an over- sensitive neurotic who had “metamorphosed” in a number of years into a being “that requires a series of generations with other organisms, which offer more resistance”. Without the mixing of blood and without coming from a family that had lived in the Dutch East Indies for generations, Multatuli...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.