Show Less

Advancing Ambition

Interests and Arguments in EU Climate Policy-Making


Werner Schäfer

This book explains under which conditions the European Union adopts ambitious domestic climate policies. It presents a theoretical framework that combines insights from rational choice institutionalism and the constructivist literature on political rhetoric. Its main argument is that ambitious sectoral climate policies emerge in situations in which the opponents of such policies run out of socially sustainable arguments to defend their positions. The framework is applied to five case studies of EU climate policy-making concerning cars, buildings, the EU’s emissions trading system (EU ETS), the promotion of renewable energy sources as well as agricultural greenhouse gas emissions.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access



Secondary Literature Andersen, Mikael Skou and Duncan Liefferink, eds. 1997. European Environ- mental Policy: The Pioneers. Manchseter, UK: Manchester University Press. Andonova, Liliana B. 2008. “The climate regime and domestic politics: the case of Russia.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 483-504. Aspinwall, Mark D. and Gerald Schneider. 2000. “Same menu, different tables: The institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European Inte- gration.” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1-36. Axt, Heinz-Jürgen; Milosoki, Antonio and Oliver Schwarz. 2007. “Europäisie- rung – ein weites Feld. Literaturbericht und Forschungsfragen.” Politische Vierteljahrsschrift, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 136-149. Bailey, Ian. 2008. “Industry Environmental Agreements and Climate Policy: Learning by Comparison.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 153-173. Barrett, Scott. 2003. Environment and Statecraft. The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. –. 2008. “Climate Treaties and the Imperative of Enforcement.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 239-258. Bättig, Michèle B. and Thomas Bernauer. 2009. “National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy?” International Organization, vol. 63, pp. 281-308. Bang, Guri. 2003. Sources of Influence in Climate Change Policy Making: A comparative analysis of Norway, Germany, and the United States. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Political Science, University of Oslo. Bang, Guri; Vevatne, Jonas and Michelle Twena. 2007. “Meeting Kyoto commit- ments: EU influence on Norway and Germany.” In: Harris, ed. 2007, pp. 279- 304. Barnes,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.