International Baccalaureate in America
Part E: Conclusions about the attack
The IB is seen as ‘un-American’ A key theme of the paleo-conservative attack is the notion that the IB promotes ‘universal’ values, which undermine ‘American’ ones. DeWeese (2004) attacked the ‘code words’ of the IB e.g. critical-thinking, social justice, and human rights. Some commentators identify this as the ‘vocabulary’ of ‘global education’ (e.g. Walker, 2002). This vocabulary can certainly be identified within ‘IB World Schools’ after the 10-point Learner Profile was unveiled, stating the core univer- sal ‘outcomes’ that the programmes should offer. Quist (2006a) uses these ‘code words’ as evidence that the IB is un-Constitutional, and therefore fundamentally (and legally) ‘un-American’. This development was noticed by Tarc (2009a p.3) when stating that: With a more fringe Right in the US, there is even a polemic that the IB promotes so- cialism and is un-American. As can be seen throughout this book, the term ‘un-American’ is a common ob- jection (alongside ‘anti-American’) made about the IB and this issue in particu- lar requires further academic clarification and understanding. This writer does not profess to be an expert on the American Constitution and this is one area where such a person could contribute to the topic. One understanding of the is- sue is offered by Micklethwait and Wooldridge (2004 p.353) when they made the point that: The fundamental fact about American conservatism is not just that it is conservative but that it is American (italics in the original version). In other words, we should maybe expect that the conservative attack on...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.