Edited By Ludwig Nagl and Chantal Mouffe
Linda M. G. Zerilli: Wittgenstein: Between pragmatism and deconstruction 25
Linda M.G. Zerilli Wittgenstein Between pragmatism and deconstruction In his enjoyable little book on Wittgenstein, O.K. Bouwsma recounts a conversa- tion he had with the philosopher during his 1949 visit to the United States. On one of their many walks together, writes Bouwsma in his rather compressed style, he [ Wittgenstein] asked me: Had I ever read any Kierkegaard? I had. He had read some. Kiergkegaard is very serious. But he could not read him much. He got hints. He did not want another man's thought all chewed. A word or two was sometimes enough. But Kierkegaard struck him almost like a snob, too high. for him, not touching the details of common life .... On the way home he asked me whether I had ever read the letter of Fran~ois Fenelon to the French Academy, against purist rules. Admit other words, if only they are sweet. Sweet! How is sweetness judged? Later he spoke of a friend of his who was an Esperanto enthusiast. He couldn't stand it. A language without any feeling, with- out richness. Strange, he said. Like a man's being offended, repelled by another man's spittle .... This is a fine illustration of the richness of his [Wittgenstein's] mind. For all this came about through what? Through seeing a sign advertising ·'cheeseburgers." That offended him! He loathed it. That was no way to derive words. And what happens? Fe- nelon.1 Bouwsma has a point. The exchange he describes is classic Wittgenstein- but not only because it shows the...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.