1. Introduction 15
CHAPTER I Introduction The claim of this work is that many macro-sociologists have insufficient understand- ing of the roots of human motivation and that this understanding seriously hampers the effort to build theoretical models of society, social organisations and social change. The aim of this work is to remedy this deficiency by providing a model of motivation for sociology. In his controversial book Consiliencethe biologist Edward 0. Wilson claims that the goal of social sciences should be to predict what will happen if society selects one course of action over another. The ideal should, in other words, be close to that of natural sciences. By this, he says, social sciences are doing badly (Wilson 1998: 181). It is a common position within social theory to give up the ideal of natural science to produce predictions. Social theory, it is said, cannot live up to these ideals, since its subject matter is far too complicated and has too many indeterminable variables. This was true and still is. But perhaps not forever. The expansion of chaos- theory within physics, biology, chemistry- and now also sociology- has made the differences between natural and social sciences smaller. It has become clear that com- plex systems exist both in the natural world and in the social world and that these systems have several similarities (Eve, Horsfall et al. 1997). Society is a complex sys- tem. Unfortunately complex and chaotic social systems are still not fully understood. We do know, however, that even complex systems display...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.