Show Less

Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Configurational Thinking in Management Studies

Conrad Schulze-Bentrop

This study was awarded the Preis des Präsidiums für ausgezeichnete Dissertationen der Universität Paderborn as well as the Preis der Unternehmergruppe Ostwestfalen für hervorragende Dissertationen.

Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) – especially its fuzzy set version – has emerged as a new methodological tool in management studies which is ideally suited to test configurational theories. For the first time, the peculiarities of QCA in large-N designs are comprehensively analysed. Based on a systematic compilation of 145 empirical QCA studies valuable insights for the use of QCA as a quantitative technique are presented. For example, an innovative formula is developed which can substantially improve future model specifications. In a next step, the potential of QCA in management research is outlined by tracing configurational theories in a range of disciplines including strategy, HRM, marketing, and international business. This tour d’horizon through management studies highlights the wide application area of the methodology. Finally, an illustrative study is conducted using the fuzzy set version of QCA.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

6. References


Abrahamson, Eric 1996. Management fashion, academic fashion, and enduring truths. Academy of Management Review, 21(3): 616–618. Ackrén, Maria & Pär M. Olausson 2008. Condition(s) for island autonomy. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 15(2-3): 227–258. Addison, John T. & Clive R. Belfield 2001. Updating the determinants of firm performance: Estimation using the 1998 UK workplace employee relations survey. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(3): 341–366. Adobor, Henry 2006. Inter-firm collaboration: Configuration and dynamics. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 16(2): 122–134. Agarwal, Rajshree, Rachel Croson, & Joseph T. Mahoney 2010. The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: An experimental inves- tigation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(4): 413–437. Aguilera, Ruth V., Igor Filatotchev, Howard Gospel, & Gregory Jackson 2008. An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3): 475–492. Aguilera, Ruth V. & Gregory Jackson 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Manage- ment Review, 28(3): 447–465. Ahuja, Gautam 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3): 425–455. Albers, Sascha 2010. Configurations of alliance governance systems. Schmalen- bach Business Review, 62(3): 204–233. Allen, Matthew M. C. & Maria L. Aldred 2011. Varieties of capitalism, govern- ance, and high-tech export performance: A fuzzy-set analysis of the new EU member states. Employee Relations, 33(4): 334–355. Amable, Bruno 2000. Institutional complementarity and diversity of social sys- tems of innovation...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.