Show Less

Minority Shareholder Monitoring and German Corporate Governance

Empirical Evidence and Value Effects


Christian Thamm

This book comprises three studies on minority shareholder monitoring in Germany. Mandatory disclosure requirements have increased transparency. An analysis of the information that is publicly available is presented, regardless of the size of the target corporation. The second essay in the form of an event study pays special attention to the German supervisory board and its appointment for a fixed term. Capital markets perceive an activist effort as being more credible under certain circumstances. The study as a whole is empirical evidence for increased minority shareholder activity in Germany. The evidence presented supports the strong shareholder rights perspective. It conflicts with the weak shareholder rights view brought forward in the international literature.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access



Achleitner, A.-K., Andres, C., Betzer, A., and Weir, C. (2011). Wealth effects of private equity investments on the German stock market. The European Journal of Finance, 17, 217-239. Achleitner, A.-K., Betzer, A., and Gider, J. (2010). Do Corporate Governance Motives Drive Hedge Fund and Private Equity Fund Activities? European Financial Management, 16, 805-828. Andres, C. (2008). Large shareholders and firm performance - An empirical examination of founding-family ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 431-445. Auer, L. v. (2007). Ökonometrie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Bassen, A. (2002). Institutionelle Investoren und Corporate Governance. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Gabler. Bassen, A., Königs, A., and Schiereck, D. (2008). Aktionärsstrukturabhängige Investor Relations bei deutschen Großunternehmen. Zeitschrift für Corporate Governance, 3, 101-105. Baums, T., Drinhausen, F., and Keinath, A. (2011). Anfechtungsklagen und Freigabeverfahren. Eine empirische Studie. ZIP Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 49, 2329-2352. Baums, T., Keinath, A., and Gajek, D. (2007). Fortschritte bei Klagen gegen Hauptversammlungsbeschlüsse? Eine empirische Studie. ZIP Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 35, 1629-1650. Bebchuk, L. A. (2005). The case for increasing shareholder power. Harvard Law Review, 118, 833-914. Bebchuk, L. A. (2007). The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise. Virginia Law Review, 93, 675-732. Bebchuk, L. A., Coates IV, J. C., and Subramanian, G. (2002a). The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Further Findings and a Reply to Symposium Participants. Stanford Law Review, 55, 885-917. 98 Bebchuk, L. A., Coates IV, J. C., and Subramanian, G. (2002b). The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and Policy. Stanford...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.