Show Less

Formal Description of Slavic Languages: The Ninth Conference

Proceedings of FDSL 9, Göttingen 2011


Edited By Uwe Junghanns, Dorothee Fehrmann, Denisa Lenertová and Hagen Pitsch

This volume contains a selection of thoroughly revised contributions to the 9th European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages. The authors apply recent formal models in linguistics to issues concerning the lexicon, morphology, syntax, semantics, information structure, and phonology in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian, Bulgarian, Czech, Polish, Russian, and Slovenian. Topics of the papers include aspect and tense, axial expressions, case, control, copula, ditransitives, focus particles, indefiniteness, infinitives, nominal phrases, numerals, temporal adverbials, trochaic lengthening, and verb stems. The papers aim at proposing both descriptively accurate and explanatorily adequate analyses, considering all linguistic levels and interfaces. Due to its analytical scope and the broad spectrum of languages covered, the volume reflects the state of the art in current formal Slavic linguistics.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Anna Bondaruk: Interplay of Feature Inheritance and Information Structure in Polish Inverse Copular Sentences


Interplay of Feature Inheritance and Information Structure in Polish Inverse Copular Sentences* Anna Bondaruk John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin Abstract The paper examines a syntactic structure of one type of inverse copular constructions in Polish, namely the sentences that contain both the verbal copula być ‘be’ and the pronominal copula to. It is first shown that just like in the corresponding canonical clauses, in the inverse copular clauses under scrutiny the verb być always agrees with the second, post-verbal element. However, evidence is provided based on tests involving the complement of uwaŜać ‘consider’, Left Dislocation, deletion of the copula, and VP coordination that, in contradistinction to the canonical clauses which represent predicational structures in the sense of Higgins (1979), the inverse copula to być clauses are not predicational, but specificational. The differences in information structure between the inverted and uninverted variants are also pointed out. Whereas in the former, the focus is always associated with the post-verbal element, in the latter either the pre- or post-verbal element can be focused. It is further noted that in inverse copular clauses analysed, the pre-verbal element shows the traits of a topic, as it must be specific and discourse-old. It is also argued that the inverted element occupies an A’-position, not an A-position based on extraction and binding facts. Consequently, the inverse copular clauses are derived in the following way: T inherits its φ-features from C and then they probe in parallel, T targets the pre-verbal DP, whereas C targets...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.