Show Less

Völkerrechtliche Haftung im Kulturgüterschutzrecht

Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Raub- und Beutekunstproblematik


Matthias Friehe

Diese Arbeit untersucht verschiedene konkrete Situationen, in denen völkerrechtliche Bestimmungen zum Kulturgüterschutz verletzt sind. Verletzungen des Kulturgüterschutzes lösen völkerrechtliche Haftungsansprüche aus. Dies gilt insbesondere für die Raub- und Beutekunstproblematik aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Hier folgt aus den Grundsätzen zur Staatenverantwortlichkeit, dass die Staaten untereinander zur Rückgabe verschleppter Kulturgüter verpflichtet sind. In Friedenszeiten lösen vor allem Verletzungen der UNESCO-Welterbekonvention Haftungsansprüche aus. Dies gilt beispielsweise für die Zerstörung der Bamiyan-Buddhas in Afghanistan, aber auch für den Bau der Waldschlößchenbrücke in Dresden. In Einzelfällen kann auch illegaler Kunsthandel eine völkerrechtliche Haftung begründen.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access



The author examines state responsibility in case of violations of international law protecting cultural properties in times of both war and peace. First of all, the term “cultural property” has to be defined in order to clarify which objects are protected by international law. The author suggests taking a new approach towards this issue: All objects that meet the specific criteria of cultural properties for society should be protected. The most important function of cultural properties is to represent nations’ cultural identity. Whether this is the case for a specific object has to be verified in accordance with its recognition as such in general or by experts. A breach of international law engages the responsibility of the state to which the illicit act can be imputed. In time of war, the Convention on the Laws and Customs of War on Land imposes major restrictions on the conflicting parties, among them the prohibition of pillage and of attacks on civilian objects. These provisions reflect the customary law that was established during the 19th century, prohibiting any form of misappropriation of cultural property regardless of whether such property has been previously in private or public hands. After World War II, the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict in 1954, as well as its second Protocol added in 1999, completed this régime. These instruments also allow states to place objects of outstanding value under special protection. It is important to note who is entitled...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.