Using Biographical and Life History Approaches in the Study of Adult and Lifelong Learning: European Perspectives
Edited By Linden West, Peter Alheit, Anders Siig Anderson and Barbara Merrill
14 Mixing Methods to Measure Leaming Benefits
1 4 Mixing Methods to Measure Leaming Benefits Tom Schuller, lohn Preston and Cathie Hammond Introduction In this chapter we give an account of research on the benefits of leaming, drawn from two phases of work (stage l and 2) within the Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of Leaming (www.leamingbenefits.net) . The aims of the chapter are: • to show how we approached our fieldwork, and to reflect on our efforts in that phase to integrate the interview data with longitudinal survey data • to present some findings from that work, although the main focus of the chapter is methodological (for a full account of the results, see Schuller et al . 2004) • to describe how we have built on the process of data integration in the current phase of the Centre's programme. We want to argue strongly for the advantages of a mixed methods approach to research and data collection as an essential complement to the much more widely accepted cross-disciplinary collaboration. Biographical research has its own intrinsic merits but we believe these are enormously enhanced the more it can be integrated into and set against other forms of research. This offers significant challenges to the research community - to its methodological and organisational capacity and also to some prevai ling epistemological attitudes. In thi s paper We outline two broad ' stages' of mixed-method research. Stage I (200 1 -2003), which involved a large scale, scoping, qualitative research project contextual ised by analysis of quantitative data; and stage 2 (2003-2004)...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.