Show Less

State Constitutions and Governments without Essence in Post-Independence Africa

Governance along a Failure-Success Continuum with Illustrations from Benin, Cameroon and the DRC

Joy Alemazung

This book in a diagnostic approach looks at the problems plaguing Africa, a continent rich in human and natural resources yet the poorest in the world. The main question is: what is the purpose of government in Africa? As illustrated by different empirical examples, the study argues that the creation of states and governments after colonialism was a «false start» and was not impacted by the social contract principle of men forming government to preserve the common good. The result is a leadership culture of government against the people with weak institutions in favour of strong autocratic rulers. The core of this study is a solution seeking approach with alternative political forms.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Chapter One: Social Contract Theories and theraison d’être of governments


Chapter One Social Contract Theories and the raison d’être of governments Social Contract Theory is based on the reasoning that a contract or an agreement exists between men in order to build a civil society where their life, liberty and estates are preserved by a political authority: government (Locke 1689: Book I: § 3). This contract is based upon human morals and the people’s political be- liefs and obligation. The Social Contract Theory has a strong impact on modern moral and political theory. Thomas Hobbes is credited as the first philosopher to give a full exposition and argument for the social contract theory in his writ- ing of 1651 titled The Leviathan. Further contributions from other philosophers, including John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, immensely increased the in- fluence of this theory, translating it into an influential moral and political theory for political systems and governments of the West and later, for other parts of the world (Lasslet 1988: 4). The social contract addresses questions surrounding our individual freedom in society as well as the “organisation” which leads to achieving this freedom and our general well-being. According to Locke (1689), men united and gave up their personal freedom for “general freedom”. However, general freedom depends upon the mutual foundation of this contract between the “state” (re- ceiver of individual rights/freedom) and the individual (giver of personal rights and receiver of services and protection from the state). In this regard, Western nations that are influenced by the moral and political impact of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.