Edited by Sebastian Tomasz Kołodziejczyk
Part IV: Metaphysics of Human Being
Part IV Metaphysics of Human Being Man as ̕Ἀρχή It is the common opinion of all the historians of philosophy that “ἀρχή” is one of the most ambiguous philosophical terms. In fact, it is. But the ambiguity of “ἀρχή ” does not mean a lack but rather a richness of its sense, as well as reveals the richness of reality caught by this sense. The Greek philosophical terms did not pretend to construct a model of reality – as something new in comparison with it. They wanted, as they want for today, to clarify reality in itself. The aim of this paper is to propose some reflections according to a supposition that from the earliest Greek philosophy the human being was interpreted as ἀρχή or was at least with ἀρχή strictly connected. Let’s consider this supposition on the basis of some texts. τὸ γάρ αὐτὸ νοεῖν ἔστιν τε καὶ εἶναι – “For the same thing can be thought as can be.”1 In these deep words Parmenides reveals the identity of Being in both these aspects: of its being (εἶναι) and of its being an object of thinking. Being “thinkable,” being an object of and for thinking belongs, therefore, to the essence of Being itself. But this essence, strictly speaking: this aspect of its essence, emerges and becomes actual only if someone thinks. Is it not the human being who does it? “To be an object of thinking” means also “to have rationality.” Therefore man is ἀρχή of the rationality of being and owing to man the fundamental statement: “it is the same thing to think and to...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.