Show Less

Interaction in Paired Oral Proficiency Assessment in Spanish

Rater and Candidate Input into Evidence Based Scale Development and Construct Definition


Ana Maria Ducasse

Defining the construct of interaction for paired assessment purposes has been difficult, despite the evolution of our view of language to include the social perspective of co-construction, and the fact that such discourse is increasingly taught and assessed. In this volume three sequenced studies define interaction in paired oral assessment through the verbal protocols of learners of Spanish and their assessors. Assessors then scale performances from videoed test performance data resulting in the development of an evidence based rating process which includes non-verbal interpersonal communication, interactive listening and interactional management.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

List of References


Afflerbach, P., and Johnson, P. (1984). Research methodology on the use of verbal reports in reading research. Journal of Reading behaviour, 16, 307-321. Bachman, L. F. (1988). Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL oral proficiency interview. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), 149-164. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bachman, L. F., and Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press. Berry, V. (1995). A qualitative analysis of factors affecting learner performances in group oral tests. Paper presented at the 17th language testing research colloquium, Long- beach,CA. Berry, V. (1997). Ethical considerations when assessing oral proficiency in pairs. In A. K. Huhta, V. Kurki-Suonio and Luoma, S. (Eds.), Current developments in language test- ing. Jyvaskyla: Jyvaskyla University Press. Berry, V. (1998). Personality and oral test score variability. Paper presented at the TESOL conference, Seattle ,WA. Berry, V. (2007). Personality differences and oral test performance. Language Testing and Evaluation Vol. 7 Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Berwick, R., and Ross, S. (1996). Cross-cultural pragmatics in oral proficiency interview strategies. In M. Milanovic and M. Saville (Eds.), Performance testing, cognition and assessment: selected papers from the 15th Language Testing Research Colloquium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bonk, W. J., and Ockey, G. J. (2003). A many facet Rasch analysis of the second language group oral discussion task. Language Testing, 20(1), 89-110. Brindley, G. (1998). Describing Language Development? Rating scales and SLA. In L. F. Bachman and...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.