Show Less


Moral Theory and Legal Practice


Antal Szerletics

This book explores and critically evaluates conceptual and justificatory models related to paternalism in the context of moral philosophy. Paternalistic interventions promoting someone’s good or protecting the person from self-harming actions raise controversial questions from a legal and an ethical perspective. The tension between the benevolent character of paternalism and its interference with personal autonomy seems to hinder the development of a coherent theory that could specify the «proper» limits of protective state interventions. The theoretical investigation is complemented by selected cases from the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Hungary.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access



Abbey, Ruth: Charles Taylor. Acumen: Teddington  2000. Ackerman, Bruce: Social Justice in the Liberal State. Yale University Press: New Haven  1980. Ackermann, Thomas:  “Case Law Review – C-36/02 Omega Spielhallen und Automatenaufstellungs GmbH v Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn”. Common Market Law Review 42 (4) (2005), pp. 1107–1120. Annas, Julia: Intelligent Virtue. Oxford University Press: Oxford  2011. Anscombe, Elizabeth:  “Modern Moral Philosophy”. Philosophy 33 (124) (1958), pp. 1–19. Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka: The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR. Intersentia: Antwerp  2002. Archard, David: “Paternalism Defined”. Analysis 50 (1) (1990), pp. 36–42. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Hackett Publishing: Indianapolis, Ind.  1999. Aristotle: Politics. Hackett Publishing: Indianapolis, Ind.  1998. Aristotle / Ross, W. D. / Brown, Lesley: The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press: Oxford  2009. Arneson, Richard: “Joel Feinberg and the Justification of Hard Paternalism”. Legal Theory 11 (03) (2005), pp. 259–284. Arneson, Richard: “Liberal Neutrality on the Good: An Autopsy”. In: Wall, Ste- ven / Klosko, George (eds.): Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham, Md.  2003, pp. 191–218. Arneson, Richard: “Mill versus Paternalism”. Ethics 90 (4) (1980), pp. 470–489. Arneson, Richard: “Paternalism, Utility and Fairness”. In: Dworkin, Gerald (ed.): Mill’s On Liberty: Critical Essays. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham, Md.  1997. Arneson, Richard J.: “Perfectionism and Politics”. Ethics 111 (1) (2000), pp. 37–63. Baron, Marcia  /  Pettit, Philip  /  Slote, Michael:  Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate. Wiley-Blackwell: Cambridge, Mass.  1997. Beauchamp, Tom L...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.