Show Less

Validating Language Proficiency Assessments in Second Language Acquisition Research

Applying an Argument-Based Approach

Series:

Anastasia Drackert

The book introduces the reader to an argument-based approach to validity as a way to improve test validation in Second Language Acquisition (SLA) research. Motivated by the need for practical suggestions for raising proficiency assessment standards in SLA research, it exemplifies the approach by validating two distinct score interpretations for a new Russian Elicited Imitation Test (EIT). Two empirical investigations with 164 Russian learners in the USA and Germany were conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the score interpretations associated with two distinct test uses. The EIT proved to constitute a reliable and valid instrument for differentiating between a wide range of oracy skills. The proposed cut scores enabled prediction of several levels of speaking and listening proficiency. The author concludes with implications for using the argument-based approach for validating assessments in SLA research, for the use of the developed Russian EIT, and for future research on Elicited Imitation Tests in general.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Appendix H: Items Measurement Report (EIT, Study 2)

Extract

225 AppenDIX h Items Measurement Report (eIT, Study 2) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Total Total Obsvd Fair(M)| Real | Infit Outfit |Estim.| Corr. | | | Score Count Average Average|Measure S.E. | MnSq ZStd MnSq ZStd |Discrm| PtBis |Items| |-------------------------------+--------------+----------------------+------+----+-----| | 265 67 3.96 3.99 | -4.82 .54 | .66 -.3 .09 -.3 | 1.19 | .33 | 1 | | 261 67 3.90 3.97 | -4.05 .50 | 1.90 1.6 .40 -.2 | 1.09 | .34 | 2 | | 219 67 3.27 3.59 | -1.91 .18 | 1.10 .5 1.31 .8 | 1.12 | .66 | 3 | | 152 67 2.27 2.26 | -.41 .17 | 1.52 2.7 1.69 2.6 | .48 | .44 | 4 | | 222 67 3.31 3.64 | -2.00 .17 | .95 -.1 .78 -.3 | 1.14 | .70 | 5 | | 191 67 2.85 3.09 | -1.20 .16 | 1.18 .9 2.30 3.2 | .47 | .66 | 6 | | 214 67 3.19 3.52 | -1.77 .17 | .99 .0 .84 -.2 | 1.12 | .70 | 7 | | 234 67 3.49 3.78 | -2.40 .23 | 1.46 1.7 1.56 1.0 | .96 | .51 | 8 | | 150 67 2.24 2.22 | -.37 .14 | .67 –2.2 .83 -.7 | 1.22 | .82 | 9 | | 180 67 2.69 2.86 | -.97 .15 | .85 -.8 1.34 1.2 | .41 | .67 | 10 | | 169 67 2.52 2.62 | -.74 .14 | 1.00 .0 1.02 .1 | .68 | .67 | 11 | | 144 66 2.18 2.16 | -.31 .17 | 1.45 2.3 1.43 1.7 | .85 | .70 | 12 | | 63 66 .95 .74 | 1.44 .18 | 1.16 .8 .85 -.5 | 1.12 | .71 | 13 | | 176 67 2.63 2.77 | -.88 .17 | 1.42 2.1 1.13 .5 | 1.08 | .79 | 14 | | 177 67 2.64 2.79 | -.90 .14 | .90 -.5 .86 -.4 | 1.09 | .75 | 15 | | 218 67 3.25 3.58 | -1.88 .18 | 1.15 .7 1.55 1.2 | .95 | .62 | 16 | | 168 67 2.51 2.60 | -.72 .14 | .94 -.2...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.