Keywords: scepsis, trope, agnosticism, relativism, regress ad infi nitum Commonly, we use the term “scepsis” or “sceptic” to indicate dubitation and disbelief at something, or they can also signify a complete refusal of the true value of certain claims. Historically and etymologically, “scepsis” (skepsis, skeptikos) does not mean the refusal of a claim but rather contemplation – a critical approach, which encourages us not to accept any conclusions without thorough and critical examination. Historically, we can distinguish several forms of scepticism, beginning with academic scepticism, an older antique form (Pyrrhonian), a middle and later antique scepticism, Islamic (Al-Ghazali’s scepticism), but also modern (Descartes’s, Mointaigne’s, Diderot’s or Hume’s), and current forms of scientiﬁ c scepticism (K. R. Popper, K. Lehrer, N. N. Taleb, D. Kahneman) de - voted mostly to the (im)possibility of scientiﬁ c proof 64 and the existence of cognitive biases in the domain of the social and natural sciences. According to the degree of scope, we can diff erenti- ate between global and partial scepticism, or between scepticism in whole knowledge and scepticism in spe- ciﬁ c content. According to the nature of the subject, we can distinguish between scepticism of the existence of something (e.g. truth), scepticism of our ability to cog- nize something (either by our senses – Plato, by intellect – Hume, or at all – Pyrrho), or scepticism about a possibil- ity of complete and certain justiﬁ cation (Proudfoot 2010, 359; Morrison 2011, 445 – 453). A special case of scepti- cism is scepsis about the possibility of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.