6. Philosophy and Science
Since its inception, philosophy has been coexisted cosily with science (at that time with protoscience). The ﬁ rst philosophers did not contemplate the inﬁ nity, as Patočka says, but they existed at the same time the co-founders of science. (see: Patočka, J.: Vznik ﬁ losoﬁ e, p. 114) The theoretical approach to the world mediated through wonder and doubts was gradually dividing and separating from philosophy. The limits of ques- tions, which can be answered unequivocally, started to be uncovered and then emerged the questions that still cannot be answered unequivocally even today. The ﬁ rst ones were assumed by science and the second ones by philosophy. What is the diff erence between them? “… science is characterized by the fact that it is based on canon of relatively ﬁ rmly deﬁ ned starting points, meth- ods and procedures, which it comes from, with the help of 98 which it chooses questions to be answered and with the help of which it searches for the answers to these questions.” (Pere grin, J.: Filosoﬁ e pro normálni lidi, p. 16). Scientiﬁ c knowledge has, unlike philosophical knowledge, ascend- ing and cumulative character. Since the time of Hippo- crates we have clearly and deﬁ nitively moved forward in medicine but the questions that nagged at Plato have still not been answered satisfactorily and we have not progressed beyond Plato’s original responses. Philosophy does not present any generally applicable results, unlike the way science fundamentally does for nature. Science in its most self-evident form improves...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.