5. Hermeneutics and Protestantism
Approaching the end of the Middle Ages, we have to men- tion the real hermeneutic revolution which was caused by Protestantism. A radical diversion from a tradition and an exclusive tendency to Scripture in how Martin Luther (1483 – 1546) realised it brought fundamental hermeneutic consequences. A principle “sola scripture” (only Scripture) and a conviction that Scripture is “sui ipsius interpres” (its own interpretative key) became the inverse hermeneutic principles of early Protestantism. Postulating of these convictions presupposed a certain renewal of the patristic thinking, for which Scripture was in the ﬁ rst place, and of the conviction concern- ing its fundamental intelligibility. Luther, as a profes- sor of Biblical exegesis, refused allegoric interpretation and claims that if a reader understands a text correctly it uncovers its own meaning to a reader. The reader’s 28 understanding is the realisation of Scripture itself. Interpretation of Scripture is its application in practice. Here comes the renewal of understanding of sensus liter- alis (literary meaning). After a short time, an eff ort to clarify the more unin- telligible passages by clearer parallel or exclusive urging on the language competence of a reader was not enough for Protestantism. It can be said that a principal weak- ness of Protestant hermeneutics was its absence. So the non-contradictoriness of the tradition and Scripture and their mutual support without detriment to its pri- macy was naturally conﬁ rmed at the Council of Trent in 1546. Shortly after that Matthias Flacius Illyricus (1520 – 1575) writes, within the scope of Protestantism,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.