Show Less

Elites in the New Democracies

Matevž Tomšič

The book deals with the analysis of key political actors in the ‘new democracies’ from Central and Eastern Europe. It is focused on character of elites, particularly political ones, and their role in the process of societal change. The author argues that elite configuration in terms of relationships between different elite factions as well as their cultural profile has strong impact on developmental dynamics of these societies. Although – at least in some countries from the region – political elites have managed to build the institutional foundations of systems of a market economy and a parliamentary democracy, with only small chances of any reverses taking place, they have been much less successful in establishing mechanisms for society’s self-organisation.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

I. Elites in modern societies


13 I. Elites in modern societies 1. Elites as social phenomenon – between power and knowledge Organised and influential minorities with evident traits of different forms of so- cial life have existed throughout the history of human civilisation. Whether a community is big or small, rich or poor, simple or complex, there are always some members who stand out as very important, very powerful or very promi- nent (Keller 1991, p. 13). Therefore, issues related to the phenomenon of elites, particularly the question of who are or ought to be those individuals and groups that have or should have the leading role in society, have represented one of the most important areas of interest for different social thinkers, from the antique times of Plato and Aristotle till the era of modern sociology and political sci- ence. The very term ‘elite’ appeared in the 17th century and originally referred to different goods of extraordinary quality. Later, its usage expanded in terms of the labelling of superior social groups, for example prestigious military units or higher strata of nobility, and it was no earlier than at the end of the 19th century (and even later in the United Kingdom and the United States) that it became widely known and applied in the social sciences (Bottomore 1993, p.1). In this context, it has to be mentioned that, as in the case of many other sociological concepts, there are great divergences amongst representatives of different theo- retical paradigms in the analysis and assessment of key...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.