Phaneroscopy, Semeiotic, Logic
Edited By Elize Bisanz
Logic Viewed as Semeiotic
Introduction Nr. 2. Phaneroscopy31
The word φανερόν, in Greek, means manifest. Now the manifest I take to be that which we find ourselves forced to admit rather than persuaded in deliberate reasoning to admit, yet under the belief in which we are so far from chafing that it seems to us more satisfactory than any ulterior reason could render it. It is that the compulsion does not seem to come from within ourselves, in which case it might be due to a too narrow association of ideas, that is, a defective experience, but seems to be the positive action upon us of the object we wish to know, which is just what makes it surely knowledge, whatever misapprehension we may perhaps have mingled with it. We reach against the compulsion, no doubt; for otherwise we should not feel ourselves to be forced. But we only react just enough to assure ourselves that it is veritably to the force of reality that we yield. Once convinced recognizing the source of the force, we are only too glad to yield to it, because experience has shown us that it is our own impulse toward believing this or that are our only enemies, while the majesty of reality our true friend. As an example of the most manifest sort of thing there is, we may take a case in which we look at an object and judge that it seems red. If anybody should ask how we can...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.