From Heraclitus to the Sophists
6. The Sophists
The word “sophist” sounds to modern ears rather defamatory, rather than as an attempt to imply serious reflection. But the Greek word sofistés in the 5th century was a rather neutral term and generally referred to anyone who knew specific, significant knowledge. It is no surprise that the sophists as vocational teachers received this designation as their own. The idea of a sophist as a “professional liar,” who misused skills for his/her own enrichment, is mainly a legacy of Plato and Aristotle. The Sophists opened new topics and transferred emphasis to new areas with the person at the centre of their interest. Even past thinking thematised the relationship between a person and the world and opened the door to the criticism of human capabilities to adequately perceive and cognise. Sophists increased these tendencies even further. ← 81 | 82 →
6.1 The Historical Context of Sophists
The rise of sophists, which can hardly be described as a single movement, is inextricably linked to the development of democracy. On one hand, democracy greatly expanded the possibilities of individual citizens to participate in government and the administration of common affairs. On the other hand, major offices should be designated to distinguished, appropriate individuals who excel over others, regardless of their origin. In the words of Pericles’ famous funeral speech: “Our constitution is called a democracy because conduct of affairs is entrusted not to a few but to the many… [B]ut public preferment depends on individual distinction and...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.