Plato and Aristotle
Ethics deal with an area of human experience, and therefore it occupies a special place among the sciences. This is explained in the sixth book of Nicomachean Ethics (1139b15-1140b9), where Aristotle distinguishes between theoretical knowledge (epistémé), the art of creating things (techné), and practical wisdom (fronésis), which is crucial to ethics. It is possible to criticise this distinction, but it is sufficient for the understanding of the nature of experience. Knowledge is theoretical and its necessary subject is a being, such a being that cannot be otherwise. On the contrary, art as well as practical sanity deal with the accidental, contingent being, which is in one way, but it may be also otherwise. An example of theoretical knowledge is mathematics that deals with the natural relationships between numbers and geometric figures. For example, it is always true that the sum of the inte ← 95 | 96 → rior angles of a triangle is 180°; it will never be more or less. A contingent being is for example a sick person who cannot be healthy. Knowledge thus proceeds to the truths regarding the necessary being. This way it differs from art and understanding. The object of art is a creative activity that has an acting cause of its creator, but a purpose in the created subject. The subject of creative activity is thus, as opposed to theoretical knowledge, a contingent, random thing that indeed exists, but need not to exist. The subject of practical rationality is moral practice and action (praxis)...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.