11. The World of Language and Discourse
The term “text” etymologically refers to the Latin textus that is translated as mesh, fabric. The text could be defined as a designation of a continuous written unit, as a language utterance captured and fixed in the written form. If we want to understand a text we have to understand the language and discourse function.
Gadamer points out “The more that discourse is a living performance the less we can realize it” (Pravda a metóda II., p. 131). Ignorance concerning itself belongs to its fundamentality. Discourse experience of the world is experienced by the world and not by discourse. He continues that the concept of discourse “presupposes the awareness of discourse. But this is the result of a movement of reflection where the thinking one extricates himself by means of reflection from the unconscious performance ← 89 | 90 → of speech and keeps distance from himself. The mystery of discourse itself lies in the fact that it can never really be totally realized. Each thinking discourse is always struck by discourse. We can think only in some language and precisely this settling of our mind in a language is a deep riddle of discourse for thinking” (Ibid., p. 129). Discourse is not only a means or a tool. The essence of a tool is availability. A human, although, seizes it, grasps it, uses it, and puts it away. Discourse is not usable in this way since we are surrounded by it, we live in it and not...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.