Show Less
Restricted access

The Death and Life of the Self

Post-Wittgensteinian Investigations


Silvia Gáliková

What is a self? What is the relation between phenomenal consciousness and the self? What are we talking about when we speak of conscious experience, the self, an inner mental world? In order to answer these questions the author reconsiders the «turn to the self» in contemporary philosophy of mind. The human self is considered as a natural phenomenon open to careful theoretical analysis, empirical and experimental research. The loss of everyday intuitions on the nature of self plays a significantly liberating role in self-understanding and explaining man’s behaviour.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

V. The Embodied mind and self


V    The Embodied mind and self

Keywords: embodiment, phenomenology, metaphor, self, illusion, subject

The meaning and use of the term “embodiment” and especially “embodied cognition” has undergone a revision in the development of both cognitive science and philosophy. Within the first-generation of cognitive science – up to the 1960s – philosophers focussed on ideas related to the representational-computationist theory of the mind. The popularity of the metaphor, The Mind as the software of the Brain, has become a popular and useful heuristic tool in cognitive research. Conscious states of minds were studied independently from the workings of the brain. Cognition was considered as embodied when it was deeply dependent upon features of the physical body of an agent or system. More precisely, the physical body has been understood as functioning beyond the brain, as “something” that plays a significant causal role in cognitive processing. This view contrasted with the ← 49 | 50 → traditional view of those philosophers of the mind that have considered the body as peripheral to understanding the nature of the mind and cognition. Proponents of embodied cognitive science appealed consistently to novel findings in cognitive neuroscience, clinical practise and experimental work. By the late 1970s, the situation culminated dramatically due to evidence of a strong dependence of concepts and reason on the body and the centrality to conceptualisation and reason on metaphorical language (metaphor, imagery, prototypes, etc.).

The major difference between first and second generation cognitive science lies in the fact that followers of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.