Show Less
Restricted access

Introduction to the Study of the History of Epistemology



The text is structured in chronological and ideological order and presents nine basic types of the classical perception of the problem of knowledge through an analysis of the atomistic theory of perception, Platonism, Aristotle’s doctrine, scepticism, rationalism, sensualism, Kant’s theory, phenomenological-existential, pragmatic, and (post) analytical perceptions. The proposed work aspires to be an introduction (not a complete presentation, neither in the number of types, nor in a full interpretation) and a basis for the reader’s interpretations which is reflected in the structure of the text.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Epistemology of British Sensualism


Keywords: sensory data, externalism, associanism, probabilism, coherence

The traditional opponent of the rationalistic approach to knowledge is empiricism (the opinion that all knowledge comes from experience) and especially sensualism, which stresses the priority and necessity of sensory knowledge. The history of sensualism goes back to Democritus and Aristotle. However, probably the most prominent representative of this approach to knowledge was the British sensualism of John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume.

The subject of epistemology should be examination of sources and origin of our beliefs, opinions and convictions. (Locke 1836, 2). Sensualists believe that the inevitable and main source of knowledge is sensory perception. They bring back to life the peripatetic motto “Nihil est in intellectu quod non prius in sensu” (Aquinas Thomas De veritate, q. 2 a. 3 arg. 19) opposing Descartian rationalists ← 87 | 88 → and Cambridge Platonists. They believe that our intellect is an unwritten table – tabula rasa – at the moment of birth. Locke was convinced that if inborn ideas existed they would have to be in every intelligent individual, which does not seem to be confirmed by experience (Locke 1836, 9). According to Locke, small children, oligophrenics, and primitive nations do not have the ideas of God, “I”, nor laws of logic. Locke documented this by the fact that small children and others do not use the pronoun “I” to refer to themselves from birth, they often contradict themselves, and they do not know logic laws or the idea of God....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.