Power and Beyond
The study of Euroscepticism so far has included mainly two specific areas: party-based Euroscepticism and public Euroscepticism. What this study aimed to articulate is the need to focus on civil society in addition to national party systems and public opinion, as non-party actors have an important function in shaping the general EU discourse (Fitzgibbon 2013:105). Moreover, analysis of civil-society-based Euroscepticism, of the way it develops and the content of the grievances it addresses to European integration and the EU are vital to a sound diagnosis of the crisis of confidence faced by the EU. In Turkey, as well civil-society based argumentative strategies on the EU are also operative and influential. The study examined the construction of Eurosceptic discourses in the civil society discourse, focussing on Turkey’s possible membership of the EU, on-going struggles between different political camps in Turkey and the general Western discourse. Notwithstanding the fact that the CSOs are not homogenous entities and have different opinions with regard to Europe, the leadership is considered to be crucial and the most important locus where discursive strategies are determined. Based on the theoretical assumptions of the Euroscepticism research, Occidentalism literature and Gramscian approach to civil society as well as on the referential/nomination, argumentation and predication strategies, and the CDA’s perspectivation and migration strategies, it has been found that there are multiple Eurosceptical argumentation strategies in the discourses varying according to ideological background and pro-AKP and anti-AKP positioning within the scope of the study. Euroscepticism may take several...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.