Theatre Performance in a Semiotic Perspective
Linguistic and paralinguistic interaction: symbolic transmission, representation, and active convention
From whatever position we may consider the interactive communication of signs on stage, it unconditionally boils down to an active interaction in three aspects of representation: verbal–verbal, non-verbal–non-verbal, verbal–non-verbal, and vice versa, depending on the active convention in a given sign system at a particular moment of the performance. Here we could specify the principle of interaction of theatre signs such as the transmission of images (possibly integrating here the concept of image or the semiotic icon) and words (which, themselves, are also images, icons) together with all the consequences of this interactivity. The only exception that we could point out in this case is music that can actually be seen as an independent semiotic principle of theatrical convention, but in the given situation, on the one hand, it is not an object of our study (in particular) and, on the other, it is an optional semiotic attribute to a theatrical performance. It is permissible (especially in modern theatrical situation) that music be completely excluded from the general stage context of the performance and this will not damage the representative volume, but it is absurd to think that a theatrical show may exist without at least one of the two representative principles: verbal or non-verbal. All signs in the system of theatre play exist in a common field of communication, each interacting with all others. On the stage it is absolutely impossible for a sign to exist for itself, as a separate unit, and in this sense,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.