Rationalising Automobility in the Face of Climate Change
6. The conduct of transportation conduct
The excerpts analysed in Chapter Six and Chapter Seven differ in a rather straightforward way. Whereas the parties to the focus group setting make the municipal strategy observably relevant in the excerpts in Chapter Seven, they do not do so in Chapter Six. Following this difference, the analyses in Chapter Six focus on how one’s own transportation conduct is made rationally accountable. On the other hand, the analyses in Chapter Seven focus on how the participants accomplish and negotiate the municipal strategy as a rational attempt to conduct the citizens’ transportation conduct. However, a very important point should be made concerning the different foci of the respective chapters. I understand the attempt to make oneself accountable for one’s own actions as an inherent part of governing, and, recalling Rose (1999), I consider this account work a part of governing, also when it is undertaken at the most molecular level. Accordingly, I understand the account work in both Chapter Six and Chapter Seven as an inherent part of governing.
Considering Chapter Six in more detail, it demonstrates how the parties to the focus group setting accomplish the rationally accountable moral order of transportation practices. As should be clear by now, I understand the in situ accomplishment of, for instance, an obligation to go by car as part and parcel of accomplishing the rational, moral order of transportation practices, that is, of accomplishing the conduct of one’s own transportation conduct. Hence, the analyses consist of the very simple...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.