Empirical Evidence on Country Level
5.1Main findings and implications
This study has analyzed the process of international accounting harmonization in the field of private firms in 110 countries between 2002 and 2014. In particular, it has aimed at answering the following two main research questions:
The first sub-study includes a time series analysis (2002–2014) and a cross-sectional analysis (2014). While the former presents the process towards Full IFRS and IFRS for SMEs adoption between 2002 and 2014, the latter provides a detailed description of the country-specific characteristics of Full IFRS and IFRS for SMEs adoption in the field of private firms in 2014.
First, the results from the time series analysis make aware of the fact that by 2002, the year the IASB started operations, only one third of the 110 sampled countries worldwide still provided domestic private firms with accounting standards that were entirely independent from those issued by the IASB. Instead, every second country had already converged their Local GAAP with Full IFRS to a small or medium extent and the remaining 20% had already adopted Full IFRS with or without minor modifications. This state of early convergence with IFRS is a surprising observation in the field of private firms as IAS and IFRS have initially been designed for the accounting of large listed multinationals only. The time series analysis clearly indicates though that IAS and IFRS already had a strong impact on domestic financial reporting systems for private firms by the early...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.