Transitional Justice, Domestic Change and the Role of the International Community
Patrycja Grzebyk - International Tribunals’ Selective Justice towards African States
| 161 →
International Tribunals’ Selective Justice Towards African States
States emerging from armed conflicts or crises face numerous political and economic obstacles as well as obstacles of a legal nature. Paramount among the legal issues essential for rebuilding a democratic, united, peaceful society respecting the rule of law is the question of accountability of those who committed international crimes like genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. In some instances, states seek aid from the international community. This is especially the case when their own judicial system is unable to address those crimes (e.g., in case of Rwanda of 1994). In other instances, the international community feels obliged to intervene in order to punish the perpetrators of atrocities, even against the will of the state’s authorities (e.g., in the case of Darfur – Sudan). The question thus arises whether international criminal tribunals, i.e. the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), are effective in supporting African states emerging from conflicts in dealing with international crimes and in fostering the development of the kind of environment necessary to establish the rule of law in those states. This question is crucial especially in light of the recently tense relations between the African states gathered in the African Union and the International Criminal Court.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.